Reflection Paper Chapter 3 (Constructivist Teaching: Interactive, Collaborative, Integrative and Inquiry – Based) By: Aldren Teodosio
REFLECTION PAPER
PRINCIPLES OF TEACHING 2
Chapter 3
Constructivist Teaching: Interactive, Collaborative,
Integrative and Inquiry – Based
CHAPTER
SUMMARY
Constructivist teaching is based on the
belief that learning occurs as learners are actively involved in a process of
meaning and knowledge construction as opposed to passively receiving
information. Learners are the makers of meaning and knowledge.
Features of Constructivist Teaching
1. Authentic activities and real-world environments
2.
Multiple Perspectives
3.
Holistic, Integrative
4.
Self-directed learners
5.
Meaningful Learning
Interactive teaching - the word interactive reminds us of people with whom the learner
interacts in order to learn. The interaction can be collaborative and so we
have collaborative teaching and learning.
Teacher’s
task
1.
Ask specific,
non-intimidating feedback questions and HOTS questions.
2.
Ask HOTS questions.
Don't get fixated at low-level of questioning.
3.
Make the focus of
interaction clear.
4.
Create the climax
favorable for genuine interaction.
5.
Do less talk to
students talk more.
Collaborative Teaching - an educational
approach to teaching and learning that involves groups of students working
together to solve a problem, complete a task, or create a product.
Teacher’s
task
1.
Begin
with the conviction that every student can share something with the attainment
of a goal
2.
Structure
tasks in such a way that the group goal cannot be realize without
collaborating.
3.
Make
the goal clear to all
4.
Ensure
the guidelines on procedures are clear especially on how their performance is
assessed.
5.
Must
make clear that at the end of the activity, the have to reflect together.
Integrative teaching - Putting together separate discipline
to make whole.
Transdisciplinary
teaching
·
Integrative
learning is transdisciplinary. This
means connecting lifeless subject matter to life itself. When the matter gets
connected to life, it becomes alive and interesting.
How can a teacher
connect subject matter to life?
1.
Depart
from teaching content for test purposes only.
2.
Reach
the application phase of lesson development.
Three- Level Teaching
·
Integrative
teaching is also done when you integrate knowledge, skills, and values in a
lesson.
·
The
three-level teaching is teaching information for formation and transformation.
Teachers task in Integrative Teaching
1.
To
do an integrative teaching, a teacher needs a broad background for him/her to
see readily the entry points for interdisciplinary integration.
2.
To
do integrative teaching by transdisciplinary and 3-level teaching mode, teacher
must be able to connect subject matter to values and to life as a whole.
Inquiry - based Teaching - Constructivist
teaching is also inquiry-based. This is teaching that is focused on inquiry or
question. It espouses investigation, exploration, search, quest, research,
pursuit, and study.
Teacher’s
task
} When using inquiry-based
lessons, teachers are responsible for:
1.
starting
the inquiry process;
2.
promoting
student dialog;
3.
transitioning
between small groups and classroom discussions;
4.
intervening
to clear misconceptions or develop students’ understanding of content material;
and
5.
modelling
scientific procedures and attitudes
REFLECTION
This chapter was comprised of
Constructivist teaching where under this teaching were Interactive,
Collaborative, Integrative and Inquiry – Based. Constructivist teaching was
defined as the belief that learning occurs as learners are actively involved in
a process of meaning and knowledge construction. The features of Constructivist
teacher was also given which adds more details and information to make
constructivist teaching be defined. This chapter also unveiled the principal
information behind what is Interactive teaching. This topic also was
accompanied with teacher’s tasks in the classroom during the interaction
process. Collaborative learning was also defined in this chapter and the
difference between interaction and collaboration was identified. During the
discussion of this subtopic, the teacher’s role during collaborative learning
was also said and explained. Another topic that was on the list is the
Integrative teaching and learning. The term was entailed with corresponding
definition and transdisciplinary teaching was also defined where it was coined
to be connecting lifeless subject matter to life itself. Moreover, the
teacher’s task was also described. Lastly, a subtopic entitled inquiry based
was also introduced. The definition was accompanied all throughout the
discussion and the teacher’s task was also taught.
As of making myself acquainted with
this chapter, I was able to know the types of constructivist teaching and constructivist
teaching, itself. Going beyond to their respective definition, I learned the
helpful uses of each when they are utilized inside the learning environment. Those
approaches will help me to integrate different kind of learning among students
and in return my students would be able to experience different tasks that
would help their academic success become even more effective and equipotent.
Aside from that, I also learned the different task that I should impose to
myself every time I will put into practice those approaches. From the
discussion of this chapter, I was able to distinguish the varying qualities of
each approach and where they are best suit to utilize. By that, getting through
to those approaches I am able to be an effective learning facilitator by the means
of those approaches.
How would I utilize these learnings?
First, if I have to impose, cooperation, collaboration and interaction inside
the classroom I will immediately utilize those approaches that were given
because, as a teacher, it is a joy for me seeing unity, teamwork and good
interaction among my students. Thus, I would not just be able to instill good
values and camaraderie inside the learning environment but I also developed a
sense of belongingness and improve students’ ability to learn from their peers
or classmates. Furthermore, I will also implicate the varying roles every time
I will utilize those approaches, because each approach the task of the teacher
was rarely different and I believe that each instances that I, myself is
anchored to my roles, I am able to be good learning facilitator where my actions
are inclined with what my approach is.
This chapter brought me to a view of
sense of social interaction of students and the effectiveness of it. So far, I
don’t have any misconception about this and it was presented as crystal clear.
Aldren
D. Teodosio BSEd II - English
Comments
Post a Comment